Showing posts with label Central Illinois. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Central Illinois. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Who Gets the Family Home During the Divorce Proceedings?


By Attorney Michael S. Fritz, Partner at Hall & Rustom, LLC

The papers were served, the divorce is underway but one question you may be asking is, “Who gets the house during the divorce proceedings?” 

Clients often ask me this question during their initial consultation and the answer is not as easy or as predictable as most would think or hope for.

The issue to determine who gets the home (or “the marital residence”) during the divorce proceedings is otherwise known as temporary exclusive possession of the marital residence. Section 701 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act provides that the court may temporarily “evict” one spouse from the marital residence during the pendency of the divorce case “only in cases where the physical or mental well being of either spouse or their children is jeopardized” by the other spouse.

Generally speaking, each spouse has equal rights to the marital residence – the fact that they are getting a divorce does not change that. Therefore, one spouse cannot force the other from the residence unless it can be shown that occupancy by one spouse would jeopardize the physical or mental well being of the other spouse or their children. This means that the spouse who wants the other ousted from the home must petition the court and meet his/her burden of proof to convince the Judge that actions of the other spouse make cohabitation a threat to his/her or the children’s wellbeing.

You may be asking yourself, “What kind of acts or facts are enough to prove that our wellbeing is jeopardized?” Although there is no bright line test for such standard, simple bickering or unhappiness would unlikely be sufficient to meet one’s burden. The Judge has the discretion to determine if a particular set of facts are sufficient to prove the need to have exclusive possession of the marital residence but often these cases hinge on acts of abuse (physical and mental), substance abuse, mental stability, gross and repeated negligence which may endanger the safety of young children, etc.

Most divorce cases do not give rise to the level of hostility to warrant an award for exclusive possession of the marital residence; which is why it is not uncommon for spouses share the marital residence during the divorce case. Although cohabitation may be uncomfortable and awkward, the ability to stomach your soon-to-be ex-spouse can end up saving you thousands of dollars. Imagine taking your family budget and adding to that, additional payments of rent/mortgage, utilities, groceries and day care, in addition to the legal fees each spouse his paying to their respective attorney. Many couples simply cannot bear these additional costs, leaving cohabitation as the only realistic option.

A divorce is a stressful situation for all involved and experienced legal advice in the field of divorce and other family related matters can help alleviate that stress. The attorneys at Hall & Rustom LLC have tried many cases involving the issue of exclusive possession of the marital residence as well as other divorce related subjects. To schedule a consultation regarding your case please call the attorneys at Hall & Rustom LLC (309) 699-4691, our office is located on the 3rd floor of the GEM Terrace Building in East Peoria, IL.


 
If you have further questions, please visit our website at www.centralillinoislawyers.com and complete our online submission form. Or, you can call our office at 309-699-4691 or email us at how@howlawfirm.com.





Michael Fritz is a partner at Hall & Rustom, LLC and concentrates his law practice in Family law with great emphasis on Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support, and College Expenses.  He also concentrates in Estate Planning & Administration, and School Law.

If you have a legal question, email Michael Fritz.



  


LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form nor should the reader rely on the information listed above as true in all circumstances. This information is provided generally and any similarity between the information listed above and an individual reader's case is purely coincidental.

The attorneys at Hall & Rustom LLC represent clients throughout the entire state of Illinois, including, but not limited to, the cities of Peoria, Morton, Washington, Pekin, Eureka, East Peoria, Dunlap, Metamora, Bartonville, Bloomington, Normal and any legal matter located in Peoria County, Tazewell County, Woodford County, Marshall County, Stark County, Henry County, Knox County and McLean County.

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

DIVORCE: Does it have to be a fight to the end?


By Attorney Michael S. Fritz, Partner at Hall & Rustom, LLC

Unfortunately for some, their marriages have deteriorated to such an extent that neither person can seemingly decide on a single issue – except for the fact that they each WANT A DIVORCE.  But not every divorce needs to be the knock- down, drag- out fight they hear about from their friends.  In fact, the most time efficient, cost effective method of divorce is the “Uncontested” or agreed divorce.  In an uncontested divorce, couples are able to combine their financial resources, as opposed to against each other, in an effort to pay for legal costs and attorney fees associated with the dissolution of marriage process.

Due to conflict of interests, a single attorney should not represent both parties in the divorce but will represent and advise either the husband or wife through the entire process.  The parties will negotiate and agree on the terms of the divorce outside the presence of that attorney and the attorney will then draft the corresponding documentation pursuant to the directions given to him by his client (of which both parties negotiated).  After the documents are drafted, the unrepresented party has the option to hire his/her own attorney to review and explain the documentation to ensure that the terms and meanings were drafted pursuant to the understanding of the parties.

The uncontested divorce process is essentially comprised of 3 to 4 stages/documents which are as follows: 

1) The Petition for Dissolution and Answer /or Entry of Appearance
2) The Marital Settlement Agreement
3) The Parenting Agreement (if child custody is applicable)
4) The Judgment for Dissolution  

The Petition for Dissolution – is the legal complaint that is filed with the court that initiates the legal proceeding.   It contains factual allegations setting forth the names of the husband and wife, the names of the children (if any), the date and county the parties reside and were married and the legal reason as to why the parties are seeking a dissolution of marriage.  The responding party files what is called an “Entry of Appearance” or “Answer to the Petition”.  In an uncontested divorce, this document is signed and entered by the other party and acts as his/her consent to the jurisdiction of the court.  Once these documents are filed, the responding husband/wife may never attend a court proceeding if he/she so wish not to attend.

Once the Petition for Dissolution and Entry of Appearance (otherwise called the pleadings) are filed with the court, the parties then create a contract called the Marital Settlement Agreement.  This contract will govern the distribution of marital assets and debts such as: the house, the cars, checkings/savings accounts, credit card debts, mortgage, etc.  In some cases this document will also include a provision for maintenance (aka alimony), if the parties agree and the facts merit such allowance.

The next document is called the Parenting Agreement (if applicable).  This document governs the terms of the child custody arrangement between the parties.  This document sets forth such things as parenting times each parent has with the children, who makes the medical decisions, educational decisions with the children, and child support and insurance coverage.  If the parties are unable to determine the custody issue on their own then Illinois mandates that the parties go to mediation with a neutral third party (usually an attorney or retired judge) to hash out the terms of their agreement.

The Judgment for Dissolution is the final order that dissolves the bonds of marriage between the parties.  The Judgment for Dissolution also incorporates the terms of both the Marital Settlement Agreement and Parenting Agreement making the terms of each court enforceable contracts.  It may also include a provision that gives the wife her maiden name. 

Whereas contested divorces can take many months or even years to complete, uncontested divorces may only take weeks, even days to complete from start to finish.  In most cases, only one court appearance is needed after these documents are executed.    The length of the time of the process usually depends on the cooperation between the parties and the availability of court time

It commonly is assumed to simply "go it alone" on, what appears to be, simple family matters.  You should always consult an attorney to determine what appropriate measures can be taken to protect your best interests.  At Hall & Rustom, LLC, we strive to think five moves ahead to protect not only your present interests, but your future interests.  To schedule a free consultation, email attorney Michael Fritz or call (309) 699-4691 to set an appointment. 
 
If you have further questions, please visit our website at www.centralillinoislawyers.com and complete our online submission form. Or, you can call our office at 309-699-4691 or email us at how@howlawfirm.com.






Michael Fritz is a partner at Hall & Rustom, LLC and concentrates his law practice in Family law with great emphasis on Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support, and College Expenses.  He also concentrates in Estate Planning & Administration, and School Law.

If you have a legal question, email Michael Fritz.



  


LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form nor should the reader rely on the information listed above as true in all circumstances. This information is provided generally and any similarity between the information listed above and an individual reader's case is purely coincidental.

The attorneys at Hall & Rustom LLC represent clients throughout the entire state of Illinois, including, but not limited to, the cities of Peoria, Morton, Washington, Pekin, Eureka, East Peoria, Dunlap, Metamora, Bartonville, Bloomington, Normal and any legal matter located in Peoria County, Tazewell County, Woodford County, Marshall County, Stark County, Henry County, Knox County and McLean County.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Child Support Payments: I can't afford them! Can an attorney help me lower the payment amount?

By Michael S. Fritz, partner at Hall & Rustom, LLC 

A popular question we are commonly asked involves child support payments:  "If I can't afford the monthly child support payments, what are my options?"

This article's purpose is to address changes in the support amount and how important it is for you to consult an attorney to assist you in the support modification process.  Now you may wonder how much this process costs, especially if you hire an attorney.

While hiring an attorney could be expensive, it is important to consider the amount of money an attorney could save you by convincing a court to modify your monthly support payments.  The fear of paying for an attorney is usually always outweighed by the amount an attorney can save you over the course of many years of lowered child support payments.

Some basic rules in changing child support payment amounts are covered in Section 510 of the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, in that:

"Support may be modified as to installments accruing subsequent to due notice by the moving party of the filing of the motion for modification." 750 ILCS 5/510

So what does this mean?  It simply means that one's child support obligation can be changed after a petition to change child support, called "A Petition to Modify Support," is filed AND proper notice is given to the ex-spouse or recipient of support.


Failure to follow the requirements of this law can have devastating effects on those obligated to pay child support but who are no longer able to pay their original court ordered amount due to a decrease in pay or change in their employment.  Those who are making less money, or no money at all, are still obligated to pay the original amount of court ordered support if they fail to correctly file a request for modification in child support.

Example:

John is ordered to pay Susan $100 per week in child support beginning January 1, 2012.  John is a responsible father who is always current on his support until April 1, 2013, when the factory he works at shuts down and he is laid off.  John quickly obtains part-time employment but only earns a fraction of what he once earned.  John does what he can but is only able to pay $75 per week in child support which is over 50% of his income but less than $100 he was ordered to pay.  Even though John is paying far more than the percentage of what he should be paying, the fact that he pays less than his court ordered ($100 - $75 = $25) means that John is in violation of the court order and will continue to accrue judgment interest on the outstanding balance until John properly files a petition to modify support.

In other instances, the recipient of child support is cheated if the ex-spouse or obligor received an increase in pay or obtained a large Christmas bonus but failed to provide any portion of that for support.  There is a wide variety of compensation that qualifies as "income" for child support purposes and each child receiving support may be entitled to their respective portion.  This too may be obtained by either enforcing the current court order for support or filing a modification for support to increase the regularly scheduled support obligation.

You will be entitled to a hearing where a judge will consider the evidence. An experienced attorney will know the important evidence to present to the judge for his/her consideration. The other side will be allowed to present evidence showing they are still entitled to the same amount or even more. Your attorney will be allowed to cross examine the opposing witnesses. In the end, if the hearing is presented properly, you have a high likelihood of convincing the judge to modify the support amount.

The importance of these proceedings cannot be underestimated. You should not try to file these court documents without experienced legal guidance.  It commonly is assumed to simply "go it alone" on, what appears to be, simple family matters.  You should always consult an attorney to determine what appropriate measures can be taken to protect your best interests.  At Hall & Rustom, LLC, we strive to think five moves ahead to protect not only your present interests, but your future interests.  To schedule a free consultation, email attorney Michael Fritz or call (309) 699-4691 to set an appointment. 

 
If you have further questions, please visit our website at www.centralillinoislawyers.com and complete our online submission form. Or, you can call our office at 309-699-4691 or email us at how@howlawfirm.com.






Michael Fritz is a partner at Hall & Rustom, LLC and concentrates his law practice in Family law with great emphasis on Divorce, Child Custody, Child Support, and College Expenses.  He also concentrates in Estate Planning & Administration, and School Law.

If you have a legal question, email Michael Fritz.





LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form nor should the reader rely on the information listed above as true in all circumstances. This information is provided generally and any similarity between the information listed above and an individual reader's case is purely coincidental.

The attorneys at Hall & Rustom LLC represent clients throughout the entire state of Illinois, including, but not limited to, the cities of Peoria, Morton, Washington, Pekin, Eureka, East Peoria, Dunlap, Metamora, Bartonville, Bloomington, Normal and any legal matter located in Peoria County, Tazewell County, Woodford County, Marshall County, Stark County, Henry County, Knox County and McLean County.

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Cyberstalking and Electronic Harassment: How far should Facebook "creeping" go?

By Attorney Jeffrey R. Hall, for Hall & Rustom, LLC 

As technological advances in communication progress, so too will potential crimes involving electronic and telephone communication.  Over the past few years, states like Illinois have enacted laws that criminalize behavior involving threats that create a "reasonable apprehension of receiving some harm" to a person involved in the communication.  Simply stated, states like Illinois have criminalized threatening someone through electronic communications.

Throughout the news airwaves, we all heard the horrific story of the mother from Missouri that created a social networking account under a fake profile and proceeded to encourage a young teenage girl to kill herself.  This type of irresponsible behavior is deplorable.  While it was not considered criminal before, it could be now.  This story, as well as other harassment stories, provided an impetus for lawmakers to draft legislation criminalizing a broad range of communication.

Presently, there are two types of electronic harassment statutes in Illinois:
  1. Telephone Harassment or Harassment through Electronic Communications (720 ILCS 135/1/2), and;
  2. Cyberstalking (720 ILCS 5/12-7.5)
So what are the differences between the two?  First, Cyberstalking is a class 4 felony and telephone harassment is a Class B misdemeanor.  But what are the other differences?  Let's look at the statutes:

Telephone (Electronic) Harassment (720 ILCS 135/1/2)

Sec. 1-2. Harassment through electronic communications. (a) Harassment through electronic communications is the use of electronic communication for any of the following
purposes:

(1) Making any comment, request, suggestion or proposal which is obscene with an intent to offend;

(2) Interrupting, with the intent to harass, the telephone service or the electronic communication service of any person;

(3) Transmitting to any person, with the intent to harass and regardless of whether the communication is read in its entirety or at all, any file, document, or other communication which prevents that person from using his or her telephone service or electronic communications device;

(3.1) Transmitting an electronic communication or knowingly inducing a person to transmit an electronic communication for the purpose of harassing another person who is under 13 years of age, regardless of whether the person under 13 years of age consents to the harassment, if the defendant is at least 16 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense;

(4) Threatening injury to the person or to the property of the person to whom an electronic communication is directed or to any of his or her family or household members; or
(5) Knowingly permitting any electronic communications device to be used for any of the purposes mentioned in this subsection (a).

(b) As used in this Act:

(1) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, images, sounds, data or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric or photo-optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer through the Internet to another computer.

(2) "Family or household member" includes spouses, former spouses, parents, children, stepchildren and other persons related by blood or by present or prior marriage, persons who share or formerly shared a common dwelling, persons who have or allegedly share a blood relationship through a child, persons who have or have had a dating or engagement relationship, and persons with disabilities and their personal assistants. For purposes of this Act, neither a casual acquaintanceship nor ordinary fraternization between 2 individuals in business or social contexts shall be deemed to constitute a dating relationship.

(c) Telecommunications carriers, commercial mobile service providers, and providers of information services, including, but not limited to, Internet service providers and hosting service providers, are not liable under this Section, except for willful and wanton misconduct, by virtue of the transmission, storage, or caching of electronic communications or messages of others or by virtue of the provision of other related telecommunications, commercial mobile services, or information services used by others in violation of this Section.

(Source: P.A. 95-849, eff. 1-1-09; 95-984, eff. 6-1-09; 96-328, eff. 8-11-09.)

So what does this mean?

This statute could (depending on the totality of the circumstances) criminalize the following actions:

  1. Continuous calling with the intent to harass or interrupt the phone service of any person.
  2. Sending harassing pictures, files, graphics, etc. with the intent to harass.  (Don't send a picture of a gun and say, "Bang, you're next."  That would likely be a crime under this statute.
  3. Transmitting a communication to a child under 13 years of age for the purpose of harassing them. (Parents:  Don't get involved in your children's petty fights with other classmates.  You may commit a crime under this statute without knowing it).
  4. Threatening to injure someone in a phone call.
  5. Allowing someone to use your phone to threaten someone via electronic communication.
Violating this statute is a Class B Misdemeanor, punishable up to six (6) months in jail and/or a $1500 fine.

Cyberstalking (720 ILCS 5/12-7.5)

A person commits cyberstalking when he or she engages in a course of conduct using electronic communication directed at a specific person, and he or she knows or should know that would cause a reasonable person to:

(1) fear for his or her safety or the safety of a third person; or

(2) suffer other emotional distress.

(a-3)      A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without
lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and:

(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or

(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint; or

(3) at any time knowingly solicits the commission of an act by any person which would be a violation of this Code directed towards that person or a family member of that person.

(a-5)      A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, creates and maintains an Internet website or webpage which is accessible to one or more third parties for a period of at least 24 hours, and which contains statements harassing another person and:

(1) which communicates a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint, where the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or

(2) which places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint, or

(3) which knowingly solicits the commission of an act by any person which would be a violation of this Code directed towards that person or a family member of that person.

(b) Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.

(c) For purposes of this Section:

(1) "Course of conduct" means 2 or more acts, including but not limited to acts in which a defendant directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by any action, method, device, or means follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about, a person, engages in other non-consensual contact, or interferes with or damages a person's property or pet. The incarceration in a penal institution of a person who commits the course of conduct is not a bar to prosecution under this Section.

(2) "Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electromagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer through the Internet to another computer.

(3) "Emotional distress" means significant mental suffering, anxiety or alarm.

(4) "Harass" means to engage in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms, torments, or terrorizes that person.

(5) "Non-consensual contact" means any contact with the victim that is initiated or continued without the victim's consent, including but not limited to being in the physical presence of the victim; appearing within the sight of the victim; approaching or confronting the victim in a public place or on private property; appearing at the workplace or residence of the victim; entering onto or remaining on property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim; or placing an object on, or delivering an object to, property owned, leased, or occupied by the victim.

(6) "Reasonable person" means a person in the victim's circumstances, with the victim's knowledge of the defendant and the defendant's prior acts.

(7) "Third party" means any person other than the person violating these provisions and the person or persons towards whom the violator's actions are directed.

(d) Telecommunications carriers, commercial mobile service providers, and providers of information services, including, but not limited to, Internet service providers and hosting service providers, are not liable under this Section, except for willful and wanton misconduct, by virtue of the transmission, storage, or caching of electronic communications or messages of others or by virtue of the provision of other related telecommunications, commercial mobile services, or information services used by others in violation of this Section.

So what does this mean?

First, a violation of this statute is a class 4 felony.  So think before you type.

Second, you have to be careful not to use your computer or phone communication abilities when you know or should know that a reasonable person would 1) fear for their safety or 2) suffer emotional distress from your actions.

For example, if you text someone from your phone saying, "I'm going to kill you. I'm on my way over to your home right now," that would likely be a violation of this section.  However, it's unclear whether threatening one (1) time would constitute a violation because the next section states that it has to happen on at least 2 separate occasions AND 1) you threaten future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, etc., OR 2) your threat places a person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm.

This statute sounds similar to the telephone harassment statute; however, it goes a step further to require the communication be repeated (more than 2 times) and that it leads to a reasonable apprehension of harm being caused to the recepient. 

This law is relatively new so there is not much case law defining what these sections actually mean.  Simply use your common sense and try not to threaten with the intent of harassing another person.

It is strongly advised to not create false accounts on social networking sites such as Facebook.  Prosecutors could file charges so long as they have probable cause you committed an offense.  If they have ample evidence that you created a false profile with the intent to harass or threaten someone, you could open yourself up to criminal charges.

Will I be formally charged with this crime?

Your county's prosecuting authority has the sole discretion in filing these charges against you.  The police simply investigate a complaint and then report it to the prosecuting authority.  While you should not use your electronic communications to transmit threatening messages, you should use your discretion and understand that you COULD be charged with a crime if it's reported by the police. 

I regularly advise my clients with children to monitor their online activity.  While you cannot monitor every form of communication, you can play an active role in educating yourself and your child in treating people as you would like to be treated.  If you have allowed your children the privilege of a cell phone, there is software that helps you monitor, block, and record certain activity.  Further, you should pay attention to what your child is doing because you could be held responsible in some situations. 

You have to be aware that some actions lead to greater consequences.  Read the above statutes carefully and then make your own decisions.

If you have further questions, please visit our website at www.centralillinoislawyers.com and complete our online submission form. Or, you can call our office at 309-699-4691 or email us at how@howlawfirm.com.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form nor should the reader rely on the information listed above as true in all circumstances. This information is provided generally and any similarity between the information listed above and an individual reader's case is purely coincidental.

The attorneys at Hall & Rustom LLC represent clients throughout the entire state of Illinois, including, but not limited to, the cities of Peoria, Morton, Washington, Pekin, Eureka, East Peoria, Dunlap, Metamora, Bartonville, Bloomington, Normal and any legal matter located in Peoria County, Tazewell County, Woodford County, Marshall County, Stark County, Henry County, Knox County and McLean County.


Article Author: Jeffrey R. Hall




Jeff Hall is managing partner at Hall, Rustom & Fritz LLC and concentrates his law practice in Criminal Law, DUI & Traffic law, driver's license reinstatement hearings and criminal record expungements.

If you have a legal question, email Jeff Hall.



View Jeffrey  Hall's profile on LinkedIn

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

I have a commercial driver's license (CDL) and I drive for a living.What happens when I'm ticketed?


By Attorney Jeffrey R. Hall, for Hall, Rustom & Fritz LLC 

In Illinois, a good career path to take is that of a commercial driver.  Everyday, we drive our state and federal highways.  Trucks of all different sizes fill the road transporting machinery & goods across the nation.  Good drivers are few and far between and the pay is substantial, when compared to other professions.

A person looking to obtain their CDL must complete certification classes and pass certain exams to obtain their commercial driver's license.  If you have already obtained your CDL, you should be aware that you must pay extra attention to traffic laws.  This is important even if you are a first offender and have a pristine driving record. 

After all the hard work obtaining your CDL, you will want to take extra precaution when driving commercially.  The laws on the books can punish you, disqualify your CDL privileges, and prevent you from earning a wage since you will not be able to drive for your job.

If you have a CDL, you will need to know about what violations can lead to a disqualification of your CDL privileges.  We have compiled a list for easy reference.  Most CDL holders do all they can to prevent one of these serious violations from going on their commercial driving record. If you are ticketed, you will likely need the ticket dismissed or at least amended to a violation that is not considered "serious" for CDL purposes. 
  • For example, if you are cited with Speeding 15-20 mph over the limit, you will need the speed amended down by the prosecutors to a speed below 14 mph for the ticket to NOT be considered a serious violation. 
Below is a list of serious traffic violations that can lead to CDL disqualification.  If you are ticketed for one of the offenses listed below, you should speak to an experienced traffic attorney that knows how to properly advise you through the process while protecting your CDL.
If you are driving your commercial vehicle and you are ticketed for serious violations and you receive court supervision or a conviction in court:
  1. Your CDL will be disqualified for 2 months if you receive 2 serious violations arising from separate incidents in a THREE year period. 

  2. Your CDL will be disqualified for not less than 4 months if you receive 3 serious violations arising from separate incidents in a THREE year period. 

  3. The federal rules governing your commercial driver's license does not differentiate between court supervision dispositions and convictions.  Thus, if you are given court supervision for a serious traffic violation, it is the same as being reported as a conviction!

If you are driving in a non-commercial vehicle (your personal vehicle), your CDL could still be affected, depending on the offense you are ticketed for:
  1. You can be disqualified from driving a commercial vehicle for a period of not less than 2 months if you are convicted of 2 serious traffic violations committed in a NON-Commercial Vehicle (e.g. your personal vehicle), while holding a CDL, arising from separate incidents, occurring within a THREE year period (if the convictions would result in the suspension or revocation of your non-CDL privileges).  (This means that if you receive 2 serious violations that would suspend your regular driving privileges, you are looking at a 2 month disqualification of your CDL).

  2. You can be disqualified from driving a commercial vehicle for a period of not less than 4 months if you are convicted of 3 or more serious traffic violations committed in a NON-Commercial Vehicle (e.g. your personal vehicle), while holding a CDL, arising from separate incidents, occurring within a THREE year period (if the convictions would result in the suspension or revocation of your non-CDL privileges).  (This means that if you receive 3 or more serious violations that would suspend your regular driving privileges, you are looking at a 4 month disqualification of your CDL).

  3. Drivers are NOT ELIGIBLE for restoration of CDL privileges during any period of disqualification.
If you are cited with DUI and you receive court supervision or a conviction for it, the following CDL penalties will occur:
  1. Your CDL will be disqualified for 1 year for your first DUI.
  2. Your CDL will be disqualified for 3 years, if, during the preceding 3 years, you received a disqualifying offense (other serious violations).
  3. Your CDL will be disqualified for LIFE for a second conviction (2nd DUI), or any combination of those offenses arising from 2 or more separate incidents.
Further, if you are pulled over for DUI, your CDL will be disqualified for 1 year if you test over .04 on the BAC test (if you were driving a commercial vehicle).  If you test over .08 in a non-commercial (personal) vehicle, your CDL will be disqualified for 1 year.


The Illinois Secretary of State considers the below listed offenses as CDL serious traffic violations (92 Illinois Administrative Code 1040) and are in addition to the offenses listed as serious traffic violations in the Illinois Motor Vehicle Code, 625 ILCS 5/6-500.26 (A), of the Uniform Commercial Driver’s License Act (UCDLA).

  • 625 ILCS 5/6-501 Violation of More Than One Driver's License
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-507(a)(1) Driving Without a Commercial Driver's License (CDL) in Possession
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-507 (b) Unlawful Operation of CMV
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-308 Disregarding Lane Control Signal
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-503 Reckless Driving
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-601(a) Speeding Too Fast for Conditions or Failure to Reduce Speed to Avoid an Accident
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-601(b)(5) 15-25 MPH Above Posted Speed Limit
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-601(b)(7) Over 25 MPH Above Posted Speed Limit
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-601(b) Over 29 MPH Above Posted Speed Limit
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-601.5 Driving 40 MPH or More in Excess of the Applicable Speed Limit.  Class “A” Misdemeanor
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-605 Exceeding the Maximum Speed Limit in a School Zone
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-605(a) Exceeding the Maximum Speed Limit in a School Zone
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-605(b) Exceeding the Maximum Speed Limit Through a Highway Construction or Maintenance Zone
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-701 Failure to Drive on Right Side of Roadway
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-702 Improper Passing Upon Meeting an Approaching Vehicle
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-703(a) Improper Passing on Left
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-703(b) Failure to Yield Right-of-Way to Vehicle Passing on the Left
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-704 Improper Passing on the Right
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-705 Improper Passing on the Left with Insufficient Visibility or Within 200 Feet of an Intersection
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-706 Driving on Left Side of Roadway Where Prohibited
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-707(b) Driving on Left Side of Roadway in a No-Passing Zone
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-707(d) Passing in Unincorporated Area Where There Exists a School Speed Zone as Defined in Section 11-605
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-708 Driving Wrong Way on One-Way Street or Highway or Around Traffic Island
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-709(a) Improper Traffic Lane Usage
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-709(b) Improper Center Lane Usage
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-709(c) Improper Traffic Lane Usage
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-709(d) Improper Traffic Lane Usage
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-709.1 Passing on Shoulder While Merging into Traffic
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-710 Following Too Closely
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-101 Operating a Motor Vehicle Without a Valid License or Permit
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-104(a) Violation of License Classification for First and Second Division Vehicles
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-104(b) Violation of Classification for Transporting Persons for Hire
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-104(c) Violation of Classification for Transporting Property for Hire
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-104(d) Violation of School Bus Permits
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-104(e) Violation of Religious Bus Driver Permits
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-104(f) Violation of Classification for Transportation of the Elderly
  • 625 ILCS 5/6-105 Violation of Instruction Permit
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-1002(d) Passing Vehicle Stopped for Pedestrian
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-1201(a) For drivers who are not always required to stop, failing to stop before reaching the railroad crossing, if tracks are not clear
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-1201(a-5) For drivers who are not always required to stop, failing to slow down and check that the tracks are clear of approaching train
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-1201(d-1) For all drivers, failing to negotiate a railroad-highway grade crossing because of insufficient undercarriage clearance
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-1412.1 Driving Upon Sidewalk
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-1414(a) Passing School Bus Receiving or Discharging Children
  • 625 ILCS 5/11-1425(b) For all drivers, failing to have sufficient space to drive completely through the railroad crossing without stopping
Learn how to obtain your CDL in Illinois by visiting: 

Commercial Driver's License Study Guide


To learn more about Illinois laws regarding driver's license suspensions & revocations:


Illinois Administrative Code: Traffic Suspensions & Revocations

If you have further questions, please visit our website at www.centralillinoislawyers.com and complete our online submission form. Or, you can call our office at 309-699-4691 or email us at how@howlawfirm.com.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: 

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form nor should the reader rely on the information listed above as true in all circumstances. This information is provided generally and any similarity between the information listed above and an individual reader's case is purely coincidental.

The attorneys at Hall, Rustom & Fritz LLC represent clients throughout the entire state of Illinois, including, but not limited to, the cities of Peoria, Morton, Washington, Pekin, Eureka, East Peoria, Dunlap, Metamora, Bartonville, Bloomington, Normal and any legal matter located in Peoria County, Tazewell County, Woodford County, Marshall County, Stark County, Henry County, Knox County and McLean County.

Article Author: Jeffrey R. Hall




Jeff Hall is managing partner at Hall, Rustom & Fritz LLC and concentrates his law practice in Criminal Law, DUI & Traffic law, driver's license reinstatement hearings and criminal record expungements.

If you have a legal question, email Jeff Hall.



View Jeffrey  Hall's profile on LinkedIn

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

What happens when I miss my traffic court date?


By Jeffrey R. Hall, of Hall, Rustom & Fritz LLC.

Many times, clients contact us after they've missed their first appearance date on their traffic ticket.  They wonder if a warrant will issue for their arrest and they are terrified. 

Not to worry!  We'll try to give a detailed breakdown of the process as to what happens after you miss your court appearance.  You'll find that you will likely NOT have a warrant issued for your arrest; however, there are still serious consequences that you will want to keep in mind.  This article only addressed the process for citations issued in Illinois. 

These consequences depend on the county for which you received the ticket. Usually, if you forget about a ticket, it NEVER simply goes away.  Illinois law commands the circuit clerks of each county to forward information regarding your failure to appear to the Illinois Secretary of State.  Once they receive the notice you failed to appear, the Secretary of State will suspend your driving privileges until you resolve the ticket.

Instead of breaking down how each county handles your ticket, I'll explain generally what happens behind the scenes.

First, once you are ticketed, you should determine if the ticket requires you to appear in court.  For most speeding tickets and other minor petty traffic offenses, such as improper lane usage, improper turn signal, failure to yield, etc., a court appearance is NOT required.  Nevertheless, you must still respond to the court in some method.  On the back of your ticket, it typically provides instructions on how to resolve the ticket.  We caution you to simply pay the ticket and be done with it.  This is important and here's why:

If you simply pay the ticket over the counter or through the mail, you are essentially pleading guilty to the offense and a final adjudication of guilt will be recorded against you and a conviction will enter.  That means points will be assigned against your driver's license. 
  • If you are under 21, you are only entitled to ONE moving violation conviction on your record in a 2 YEAR period.  If you receive two moving violation convictions in a 2 year period, your driving privileges will be suspended for a period not to exceed 1 year.  Depending on the severity of the ticket, such as speeding 21-30 mph over the limit, your driving privileges will likely be suspended between 6 months to 1 year.  If you receive a minor traffic violation, such as speeding 1-20 mph over the limit, your driving privileges will likely be suspended for 3-6 months.
  • If you are 21 and over, you are entitled to TWO moving violation convictions on your record in a 1 YEAR period.  If you receive THREE moving violation convictions on your record in a 1 YEAR period, your driving privileges will be suspended for a period not to exceed 1 year.  Again, depending on the severity of the ticket, such as speeding 21-30 mph over the limit, your driving privileges will likely be suspended between 6 months to 1 year.  If you receive a minor traffic violation, such as speeding 1-20 mph over the limit, your driving privileges will likely be suspended for 3-6 months
It is recommended that you obtain a printout of your driving record (abstract) from your local DMV to determine what moving violations are actually on your record.  The record may be difficult to read so it is recommended that you consult an experienced traffic attorney to read your record to determine what effect, if any, will result from your present traffic citation.

Now, back to your court date.  Once your name is called in open court and you do not answer, the prosecutors will generally write on the file "Defendant Failed to Appear. Ex Parte Judgment issued."  They will present the file to the judge and the judge will sign.  Essentially, the court is taking judgment against you in your absence.  Thus, a conviction will enter against you.

However, if the ticket is not a petty traffic offense, but rather, a traffic misdemeanor, such as Driving While License Suspended, the court will usually issue a warrant.  Make sure you do not miss your court date if your ticket is for a misdemeanor.

Once you realize you've missed your court date, you will likely have to vacate the conviction against you if you want to "undo" the conviction that was entered by the court in your absence.  Here is where an attorney can be effective for you.  Your attorney will draft the motion to vacate, set it for hearing, then negotiate the terms of the citation with the prosecutors so the punishment against you will be as minimal as possible.  Prosecutors will look at your record as well.  If you have a poor driving record, the prosecutors may object to vacate the conviction against you.  However, if it has not been more than 30 days since you missed your court date (or the judge signed the "ex parte" judgment against you), the court will likely reopen the case against you.  If it is beyond 30 days since you missed your court date, it is harder to get your case reopened since you are beyond your "30 day Appeal" window.  On these tickets, time is of the essence to act responsibly.  That is why it is important to consult an attorney to assist you.

Your attorney can then negotiate the terms of the ticket.  We always ask for some type of disposition that will not affect your driving record, such as dispositions resulting in court supervision.  

What is Court Supervision in Illinois?  Court supervision is NOT a final adjudication of guilt.  The court is simply indirectly monitoring your behavior during a set period of time (not to exceed 1 year on petty offenses and 2 years for misdemeanor offenses).  If you abide by the terms of your court supervision (pay your fines and costs, complete any public service hours, attend the driver improvement course, not violate any law of any jurisdiction, etc), your case will close at the end of the period of supervision and NO CONVICTION will be entered.

You will typically be assessed fines and court costs.  Thus, so long as you pay the fines and court costs within your time limit given and you do not violate any other laws of any jurisdiction, the ticket will not affect your driver's license.

In conclusion, if you miss your court date, do not fret.  Simply print out a copy of your driving record at your local DMV and contact an experienced traffic attorney to assist you.  The conviction is not set in stone and if you act quickly, your attorney can undo the damage your absence caused.

It should be noted that some counties will not issue an ex parte judgment against you.  They will simply send out a 30 day notice to you that if you do not pay the ticket within 30 days, they will forward a "Failure to Pay Notice" to the Illinois Secretary of State (SOS).  Once the SOS receives the notice, they will suspend your driving privileges until you pay the ticket and they receive the receipt from the clerk's office.  Remember, if your are suspended for not paying a traffic ticket, your driver's license will not automatically reinstate once you pay the ticket.  The SOS needs to receive confirmation that it was paid from the clerk's office.  This may take a few days AFTER you pay the ticket.

Below is helpful information regarding Notices to Appear, Minimum Present Bond Amounts, Required Appearances, and Traffic Enforcement Bail Procedure.  (Taken from the Illinois Traffic Offense Code Book.  It can viewed here:  http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/publications/pdf_publications/sos_dop10.pdf

NOTICE TO APPEAR

Whenever a peace officer is authorized to arrest a person without a warrant, the officer may instead issue to such person a Notice to Appear.  The notice shall be in writing; state the name of the person and his address, if known; set forth the nature of the offense; be signed by the officer issuing the notice; and request the person to appear before a court at a certain time and place.  Upon failure of the person to appear, a summons or warrant of arrest may be issued.  

MINIMUM PRESET BAIL AMOUNTS

Traffic Offenses. The basic Rule 526(a) presets bail for minor traffic cases at $120. Bail is preset to avoid undue delay when it is not practicable to bring the accused before a judge.
  • Those violations denoted by an asterisk (*) require mandatory court appearance.
  • Those violations denoted by an asterisk (*) are exempt from the provisions of the NONRESIDENT VIOLATOR COMPACT, and the normal Supreme Court Bail Rule applies.
  • Those violations denoted by the number sign (#) require fingerprinting of the violator.

    IN EVERY CASE THE PERTINENT ILCS SECTION SHOULD BE READ TO DETERMINE THE PROPER CHARGE AND BAIL.

    ADDITIONAL SUPREME COURT RULES
    1. AppearanceDate-Rule504
    The date set by the arresting officer for an accused’s first appear- ance in court shall be “not less than 14 days but within 60 days after the date of arrest, whenever practicable.”

    2. Substitution of Cash Bail-Rule 554

    (a) Not sooner than 10 court days after arrest and not later than three court days before the date set for appearance in court, an accused who deposited driver’s license or a bond certificate in lieu of cash bail, or who was released on Notice to Appear, promise to comply, or individual bond under Rule 553(d) may recover either his license or bond certificate or further secure his release by substituting cash bail in the amount required by this article with the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which the violation occurred; provided, however, that no driver’s license required to be deposited under subparagraph (d) of Rule 526 may be recovered under this rule. The clerk may waive the time limits, specified by this rule.

    (b) In all cases in which a court appearance is not required, under Rule 551, an accused who desires to satisfy the charge but is unwilling to plead guilty may substitute cash bail under paragraph (a) of this rule; in such event, if the accused does not appear on the date set for appearance, or any date to which the case may be continued, it shall be presumed he has consented to the entry of an EX PARTE judgement (see Rule 556(b)).

    3. Driver’s License in Lieu of or in Addition to Bail-Rule 526(e)

    “...In lieu of posting the cash amounts specified (for sections: 3- 708, 11-401(a), 11-501 and 11-504, of the IVC) an accused must post $1,000 bail and his current Illinois driver’s license. Persons who do not possess a valid Illinois driver’s license shall post bail in the amounts specified in Rule 526(c) or 525 (d), except than an accused may deposit a approved bond certificate in lieu of bail specified in subparagraph (1) or (8) of 526 (c).”

    4. Bail Schedule-Ordinance Offenses, Petty Offenses, Business Offenses and Certain Misdemeanors-Rule 528

    (a) Offenses punishable by fine not to exceed $1,000. Bail for offenses (other than traffic or conservation offenses), including ordinance violations, punishable only by a fine which does not exceed $1,000, shall be $120.

    (b) Offenses punishable by fine in excess of $1,000. Bail for offenses (other than traffic or conservation offenses) punishable only by a fine which exceeds $1,000 shall be $1,500.

    (c) Certain other offenses. Bail for any other offenses, including violation of any ordinance of any unit of local government (other than traffic or conservation offenses), punishable by fine or imprisonment in a penal institution other than the penitentiary, or both, shall be $1,000, as provided in paragraph (d) of this Rule 528, and except that bail for Class C misdemeanors shall be $75.

    (d) Domestic violence offenses. No bail is established under these rules as provided in Section 110-15 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/110-15) for the offense of domes- tic battery (720 ILCS 5/12-3.2), a violation of an Order of Protection (720 ILCS 5/12-30), or any similar violation of a local ordinance. Bail for these offenses shall be set by the court pursuant to statute.

    5. RequiredAppearance—Rule 551

    A court appearance is required for the following:

    (a) All alleged Class A and B misdemeanor violations of the Illinois Vehicle Code.
    (b) All alleged violations of the following specified sections:

    3-707  Operating without insurance
    3-708  Operating when registration suspended for non-insurance
    6-101 No valid driver’s license
    6-104 Violation of classification
    6-113 Operating in violation of license or permit
    6-301 Unlawful use of license or permit
    11-409 Making a false report
    11-601(b) Speeding-Only when more than 30 mph over the posted limit
    11-1414(a) Passed school bus-loading or unloading
    15-112(h) Refusal to stop and submit vehicle and load to weighing after being directed to do so by an officer, or removal of load prior to weighing 15-301(j) Violation of excess size and weight permit

    (c) All alleged violations of the Child Passenger Protection Act.
    (d) Any traffic offense which results in an accident causing the death of any person or injury to any person other than the accused.
    (e) Conservation offenses for which more than $120 bail is required under Rule 527 or for which civil penalties are required under Section 20.35 of the Fish and Aquatic Life code or Section 3.5 of the Wildlife code.
    (f) Offenses arising from multiple charges, as provided in Rule 503.
    (g) Violations of any ordinance of any unit of local government defin- ing offenses comparable to those specified in subparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) and (h) of this Rule 551.
    (h) Any minor traffic offense where the statutory minimum fine is greater than $95, except those offenses involving truck violations under Rule 526(b)(1) or similar municipal ordinances.
TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT BAIL PROCEDURE

625 ILCS 5/6-306.3 License as bail.


(a) Except as provided in Section 6-306.4 of this Code, any person arrested and charged with violation of Section 3-701, 3-707 or 3- 710 or of any violation of Chapters 11 or 12 of this Code, except the provisions of Sections 3-708, 11-401, 11-501, 11-503 or 11-504 of this Code shall have the option of depositing his valid driver’s license issued under this Code with the officer demanding bail in lieu of any other security for his appearance in court in answering to any such charge.

(b) However, a uniform bail schedule and regulations adopted pur- suant to Supreme Court Rule or Order may require that a driver’s license issued under this Code must be deposited, in addition to appropriate cash deposit, where persons arrested and charged with violating Sections 3-708, 11-401, 11-501, 11-503 or 11-504 of this code elect to take advantage of a uniform schedule establishing the amount of bail in such cases.

Rule 501(g)

(g) Promise to Comply. An option available to residents of other member jurisdictions of the Nonresident Violator Compact of 1977

to obtain release from custody without bail following arrests on view for minor traffic offenses (see Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 95 1/2, par. 6–306.4(a) 625 ILCS 5/6–306.4(a)) by signing a written promise to comply with the terms of the Uniform Citation and Complaint. Residents of Illinois, and nonresidents charged with traffic offenses specified in subsection 6–306.4(b) of the Illinois Vehicle Code, as amended, shall not be released on a promise to comply, but must post bail or secure release in accordance with these rules. 


If you have further questions, please visit our website at www.centralillinoislawyers.com and complete our online submission form. Or, you can call our office at 309-699-4691 or email us at how@howlawfirm.com.

LEGAL DISCLAIMER

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form nor should the reader rely on the information listed above as true in all circumstances. This information is provided generally and any similarity between the information listed above and an individual reader's case is purely coincidental.

The attorneys at Hall, Rustom & Fritz LLC represent clients throughout the entire state of Illinois, including, but not limited to, the cities of Peoria, Morton, Washington, Pekin, Eureka, East Peoria, Dunlap, Metamora, Bartonville, Bloomington, Normal and any legal matter located in Peoria County, Tazewell County, Woodford County, Marshall County, Stark County, Henry County, Knox County and McLean County.

Article Author: Jeffrey R. Hall




Jeff Hall is managing partner at Hall, Rustom & Fritz LLC and concentrates his law practice in Criminal Law, DUI & Traffic law, driver's license reinstatement hearings and criminal record expungements.

If you have a legal question, email Jeff Hall.



View Jeffrey  Hall's profile on LinkedIn